1986 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1998 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1998 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1998 Volkswagen Polo. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1998 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 120 kg more than 1998 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Buick Skyhawk | 1998 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Buick | Volkswagen |
| Model | Skyhawk | Polo |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1043 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |
