1986 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2001 Cadillac Catera
To start off, 2001 Cadillac Catera is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 625 kg more than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Cadillac Catera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Cadillac Catera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Buick Skyhawk | 2001 Cadillac Catera | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | Skyhawk | Catera |
Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2962 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2940 mm |