1986 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2005 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (254 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 604 kg more than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Buick Skyhawk | 2005 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Buick | Jaguar |
Model | Skyhawk | XJ |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 254 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1684 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3170 mm |