1986 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 5,438 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLS (469 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 380 more horse power than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 840 kg more than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Buick Skyhawk | 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Skyhawk | CLS |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 5438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 469 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3090 mm |