1986 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 145 kg more than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Buick Skyhawk | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Skyhawk | 3 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2650 mm |