1986 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 928 kg more than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Nissan Pathfinder. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Buick Skyhawk | 2010 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Buick | Nissan |
Model | Skyhawk | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 2008 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4884 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1849 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2850 mm |