1986 Buick Skylark vs. 1950 Holden FX

To start off, 1986 Buick Skylark is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Buick Skylark (89 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Buick Skylark weights approximately 200 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skylark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Buick Skylark (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1986 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX. 1986 Buick Skylark has automatic transmission and 1950 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1950 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Buick Skylark will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: