1986 Buick Skylark vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1986 Buick Skylark is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. Both 1986 Buick Skylark and 1982 Chevrolet Camaro are equipped with a 2,474 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skylark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 179 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Buick Skylark | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | Skylark | Camaro |
Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2580 mm |