1986 Buick Skylark vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1986 Buick Skylark is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Buick Skylark (89 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Buick Skylark weights approximately 400 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Buick Skylark (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Buick Skylark | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Buick | Zastava |
Model | Skylark | 102 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2160 mm |