1986 Buick Skylark vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 281 kg more than 1986 Buick Skylark.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Buick Skylark has automatic transmission and 2010 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2010 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Buick Skylark will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Buick Skylark | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | Skylark | C30 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2639 mm |