1986 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1952 Alfa Romeo 1900
To start off, 1986 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 5,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 850 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 1900.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Cadillac Brougham | 1952 Alfa Romeo 1900 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Brougham | 1900 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5030 cc | 1884 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2710 mm |
