1986 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1982 Fiat Vivace
To start off, 1986 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 5,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1982 Fiat Vivace.
Because 1986 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Brougham | 1982 Fiat Vivace | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | Brougham | Vivace |
Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5030 cc | 1372 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 64 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2230 mm |