1986 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 300 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Cadillac Brougham | 1996 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | Brougham | Clio |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5030 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 250 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2490 mm |
