1986 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Cadillac Brougham | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | Brougham | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5030 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3270 mm |
