1986 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 190 kg more than 2001 Ford Ranger.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Brougham | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Brougham | Ranger |
Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5030 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3010 mm |