1986 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2002 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1205 kg more than 2002 ZAZ Wagon.
Because 1986 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Brougham | 2002 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Cadillac | ZAZ |
Model | Brougham | Wagon |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5030 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 50 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2330 mm |