1986 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 375 kg more than 1986 Cadillac Brougham.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Brougham | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Brougham | Econoline |
Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5030 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3510 mm |