1986 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2003 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2003 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 844 kg more than 2003 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1986 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Brougham | 2003 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
Model | Brougham | Polo |
Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5030 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 101 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1106 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2590 mm |