1986 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2008 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2008 Suzuki Reno is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 470 kg more than 2008 Suzuki Reno.
Because 1986 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Brougham | 2008 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | Brougham | Reno |
Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5030 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2610 mm |