1986 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Brougham | 2012 Mercedes-Benz R | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Brougham | R |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5030 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 302 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5156 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1958 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3216 mm |