1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1964 Rover P6
To start off, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rover P6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rover P6 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1964 Rover P6. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1964 Rover P6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Rover P6 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1964 Rover P6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Rover P6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 1964 Rover P6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | Cimarron | P6 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2630 mm |