1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 240 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cimarron | Celeste |
Year Released | 1986 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1410 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2350 mm |