1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 265 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 265 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 265 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 265. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Cimarron | 265 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |
