1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 1998 Rover 75 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 75 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 75 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 1998 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | Cimarron | 75 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2750 mm |
