1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 3,783 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 390 kg more than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Cimarron | Monte Carlo |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 3783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2810 mm |