1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace
To start off, 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace. (89 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace weights approximately 565 kg more than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Cimarron | Hi-Ace |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2444 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |