1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2001 Lada Samara II
To start off, 2001 Lada Samara II is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2001 Lada Samara II. (67 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2001 Lada Samara II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 180 kg more than 2001 Lada Samara II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 2001 Lada Samara II | |
Make | Cadillac | Lada |
Model | Cimarron | Samara II |
Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2470 mm |