1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2002 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2002 Ford Fusion is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2002 Ford Fusion. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Fusion.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 2002 Ford Fusion | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Cimarron | Fusion |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2500 mm |
