1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2002 Holden Astra
To start off, 2002 Holden Astra is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2002 Holden Astra. (120 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Astra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 2002 Holden Astra | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Cimarron | Astra |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |