1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2009 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 399 kg more than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 2009 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Cimarron | HHR |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1549 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2640 mm |