1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Cimarron | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2490 mm |
