1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 179 kg more than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Cimarron | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2880 mm |