1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Cimarron | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1306 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2710 mm |
