1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC90 (185 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Cimarron | XC90 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 185 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1897 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2860 mm |