1986 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Cimarron | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Cimarron | Matrix |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1765 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2601 mm |