1986 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1980 Volvo 265

To start off, 1986 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 4,087 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Cadillac DeVille (129 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 265. (82 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 265. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 40 kg more than 1980 Volvo 265. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1980 Volvo 265 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 265. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Cadillac DeVille (271 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 265. (145 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1986 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 265.

Compare all specifications: