1986 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 1986 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1986 Cadillac Eldorado. (133 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 1986 Cadillac Eldorado.
Because 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Cadillac Eldorado (270 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. (258 Nm). This means 1986 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Eldorado | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Eldorado | 280 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4080 cc | 2778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 270 Nm | 258 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 86.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 78.7 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2410 mm |