1986 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Cadillac Eldorado (133 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Cadillac Eldorado (270 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1986 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Eldorado | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Eldorado | Matrix |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4080 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2601 mm |