1986 Cadillac Seville vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac Seville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac Seville would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1986 Cadillac Seville. (129 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1986 Cadillac Seville.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Cadillac Seville (270 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1986 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Cadillac Seville | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Seville | E-350 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4127 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2619 mm |