1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1950 Maserati 4CLT
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 4CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 4CLT would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati 4CLT (276 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati 4CLT should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1950 Maserati 4CLT | |
| Make | Caterham | Maserati |
| Model | 1700 | 4CLT |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2510 mm |
