1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1955 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford Thunderbird (209 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 1955 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | 1700 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1986 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 4785 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 209 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2600 mm |