1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1958 Jaguar MK VIII
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jaguar MK VIII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jaguar MK VIII would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jaguar MK VIII is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Jaguar MK VIII (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Jaguar MK VIII should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1958 Jaguar MK VIII | |
| Make | Caterham | Jaguar |
| Model | 1700 | MK VIII |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 3442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 77 L |
