1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1958 Talbot 2500
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Talbot 2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Talbot 2500 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Talbot 2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1958 Talbot 2500. (119 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1958 Talbot 2500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1958 Talbot 2500 | |
| Make | Caterham | Talbot |
| Model | 1700 | 2500 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1958 |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2510 mm |
