1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1960 DKW Junior
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Junior would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1960 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Junior.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Junior, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1960 DKW Junior | |
| Make | Caterham | DKW |
| Model | 1700 | Junior |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 741 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2180 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 31 L |
