1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1963 Rover P6
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P6 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover P6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1963 Rover P6. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover P6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1963 Rover P6 | |
| Make | Caterham | Rover |
| Model | 1700 | P6 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 54 L |
