1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1964 Holden EH
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,929 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1964 Holden EH has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1964 Holden EH will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1964 Holden EH | |
| Make | Caterham | Holden |
| Model | 1700 | EH |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2680 mm |
