1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1965 Lancia Flaminia
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lancia Flaminia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lancia Flaminia would be higher. At 2,458 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Lancia Flaminia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1965 Lancia Flaminia. (101 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1965 Lancia Flaminia.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1965 Lancia Flaminia | |
| Make | Caterham | Lancia |
| Model | 1700 | Flaminia |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2458 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 160 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 42 L |
