1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1968 Pontiac GTO
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Pontiac GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Pontiac GTO would be higher. At 6,549 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Pontiac GTO (365 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Pontiac GTO should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1968 Pontiac GTO | |
| Make | Caterham | Pontiac |
| Model | 1700 | GTO |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 6549 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 365 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 69 L |
