1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1970 Lotus 72
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Lotus 72. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Lotus 72 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Lotus 72 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Lotus 72 (429 HP @ 10000 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Lotus 72 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1970 Lotus 72 | |
| Make | Caterham | Lotus |
| Model | 1700 | 72 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1970 |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 429 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 10000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
