1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1974 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 1,971 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1974 Lotus Eclat. (160 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1974 Lotus Eclat.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1974 Lotus Eclat | |
| Make | Caterham | Lotus |
| Model | 1700 | Eclat |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 67 L |
